Even before COVID-19, many users were dissatisfied with how major social media platforms were dealing with the challenges of misinformation, as well as censorship, privacy, political neutrality, user control, and malicious activity. These concerns have sparked an emerging trend: decentralized social networks, also known as federated networks.
Decentralized social networks make up the fediverse, a term for a collection of interconnected servers used for social networking and other activities such as blogging and web publishing. An independently hosted federated network can interact with other networks in the fediverse.
Corporate entities control major social media sites, and a small group of people within these companies sets the rules of engagement. This has raised concerns about free speech and censorship among users. Last year, Facebook enacted high-profile bans on individuals from all sides of the political spectrum, from Louis Farrakhan to Alex Jones. Banning violent, hateful, and dangerous messaging helps protect social media users from malicious online activity, but some believe the bans run contrary to ideals of free speech.
A decentralized social network allows users more control. Unlike centralized social networking platforms, federated networks foster independence without a central authority. Benefits include censorship resistance, ownership over personal data, and improved control over user-generated content. In other words, users do not accept censorship and insist on having the final say on their content. This means no one else, whether a corporation or site administrator, can make modifications to content created by users. No one can remove content generated by users, either.
Decentralized social networks have provided another answer to data privacy and security. On federated social networks, users can create accounts without having to link to real-world identities, like email addresses or phone numbers. Furthermore, these networks often rely on public-key cryptography for account security, rather than relying on a single organization to protect user data.
While this can create advantages from a data security perspective, it also presents challenges. For example, bootstrapped federated social networks may shut down because of a lack of funds, causing users to lose their data and connections. In this instance, users have no simple way to reconnect with others on the network because federated networks do not keep records of personal data on servers. In terms of privacy, these platforms do not necessarily encrypt data, which means that private messages may be visible to administrators.
In addition to the virtual certainty that private censorship will lead to takedowns of valuable speech, it is already leading to attacks on anonymous speech. Anonymity and pseudonymity have played important roles throughout history, from secret ballots in ancient Greece to 18th century English literature and early American satire. Online anonymity allows us to explore controversial ideas and connect with people around health and other sensitive concerns without exposing ourselves unnecessarily to harassment and stigma. It enables dissidents in oppressive regimes to tell their stories with less fear of retribution. Anonymity is often the greatest shield that vulnerable groups have.
Most nude content is legal, and engaging with such material online provides individuals with a safe and open framework to explore their identities, build communities, and discover new interests. However, social networks and payment processors are intervening to become the arbiters of how people create and engage...
Another set of problems in censorship circumvention are about making it more difficult to identify and block censored or circumvention traffic. Our group has worked extensively on this problem; we have designed censorship resistant algorithms for peer-to-peer lookups; found new attacks on systems that hide circumvention traffic in other, legitimate traffic; and designed special purpose systems that deliver uncensored video and social network contents without requiring relay discovery or special-purpose client software. We are also investigating attacks and deployment strategies for \"decoy routing\" systems, that can use a large set of \"overt\" destinations to disguise circumvention traffic.
In this section, you will also come across \"Personalization and data,\" which allows you to control -- to an extent -- how the social network personalizes content, collects data, and what information is shared with third parties. You have the option to choose not to view personalized adverts, but the main setting you need to be aware of is for sharing.
According to the Ant Network roadmap, the goal of launching the network is to create an advertising and social media sharing platform similar to YouTube. Differences between YouTube and Ant Network would be:
However, competing with YouTube is of course challenging due to switching costs. Majority of everyday users are unlikely to switch to a new platform when all their followers and followees are on the older platform. There are very rare cases of social networks losing their dominance and that takes generations. For example, Facebook is losing its dominance to Tiktok but that has only happened in young adults so far.
Boris Cipot, senior security engineer at Synopsys, added: To achieve the highest level of anonymity, one would need to get rid of any installation of OS or software with tracking, thus allowing the user to enter the Tor network with a clean slate.
At Minc Law, we have proven success in removing defamatory posts, profiles, and content from popular social media and professional networking websites. We also have extensive experience stopping harassment on social media and holding perpetrators accountable for their actions. We pride ourselves on achieving results as quickly and efficiently as possible, without drawing unwanted attention to these sensitive situations.
Most individuals use social media platforms to stay in touch with friends and family, make new friends, find romantic partners, and connect with public figures (such as celebrities, athletes, and politicians). And most businesses create social media platforms to improve brand awareness and network with potential customers.
The ability to create anonymous profiles allows such individuals to post defamatory content with the assumption that they are untraceable. This assumption leads many social media users to be bold and post without a filter.
This paper presents Clouds, a peer-to-peer protocol that guarantees both anonymity and censorship resistance in semantic overlay networks. The design of such a protocol needs to meet a number of challenging goals: enabling the exchange of encrypted messages without assuming previously shared secrets, avoiding centralised infrastructures, like trusted servers or gateways, and guaranteeing efficiency without establishing direct connections between peers. Anonymity is achieved by cloaking the identity of protocol participants behind groups of semantically close peers. Censorship resistance is guaranteed by a cryptographic protocol securing the anonymous communication between the querying peer and the resource provider. Although we instantiate our technique on semantic overlay networks to exploit their retrieval capabilities, our framework is general and can be applied to any unstructured overlay network. Experimental results demonstrate the security properties of Clouds under different attacks and show the message overhead and retrieval effectiveness of the protocol.
In spite of this web potentate's proclamations of opposition to 'censorship' and drama queen antics condemning SOPA, his pet forum instituted the most oppressive brand of censorship I have ever seen on the Internet. His mostly middle-aged female forum members were censored for the mildest jokes and any posting deemed 'political' by his moderators. If they followed the site's many conduct rules and yet expressed opinions out of lockstep with the site owner's moderators, subtly cruel forms of social engineering were used to make participation noxious.
But this is where things get tricky. Should a social network provide a government with information about somebody who uses their account to disturb public order, launch hoaxes, defame or incite others to violence What about a person who criticizes the Beloved Leader or a member of the LGTBQ+ community in a country with highly restrictive sexual norms The cultural aspects and legal jurisdictions of each country are fundamental here, and often place companies in multiple dilemmas.
I am creating an alternative social media platform for Dutch people. Its called Dutch underground network engine and its online. Not sure if I can share it here.. Do feel it deserves a place here and its not out of context so without further adue heres my new site DUNE.wtf
Schools subject to CIPA have two additional certification requirements: 1) their Internet safety policies must include monitoring the online activities of minors; and 2) as required by the Protecting Children in the 21st Century Act, they must provide for educating minors about appropriate online behavior, including interacting with other individuals on social networking websites and in chat rooms, and cyberbullying awareness and response.
Decentralized social media platforms are social networking platforms that are decentralized, and therefore not subject to centralized control or censorship. Decentralized social media platforms use decentralized technology such as blockchains and distributed nodes, such that the network and platform is spread across many points of failure. Decentralized social networks typically offer users more control over their personal data and content, and some blockchain-based social networks also feature a cryptocurrency aspect where users can earn tokens from the network. Decentralized social media networks are valuable to users who value free speech, data portability, and sovereignty. Here's a list of the best decentralized social media platforms and networks: 153554b96e